Wednesday, 21 October 2015

INTRODUCTION TO CONVEYANCING

Task 1:

Introduction:
The problem in the paper relates to the acquisition of the property by the plaintiff. The defendant has agreed to buy the property at the stipulated price. The dispute pertains to the transfer of the ownership of the property.
Discussion
The due diligence check of title of property by in 15 Green Hollywood includes following things
1.      The seller title to the property to guarantee that the purchaser will acquire a decent and attractive title
2.      The degree of any lawful rights, confinements, commitments, liabilities and dangers connected with the property. 
3.       Some other lawful liabilities or commitments coming about because of the buy.
(Harrow London Borough Council v Shah , 1999)
The checklist of due diligence check is long lasting but some of main areas of check are as follows
•           Client Authorization Letter
•           Signed Letter of Intent
•           Investment Committee Presentation and Approval
•           Request/get Due Diligence Materials
•           Portfolio Manager Authorization Letter
•           Obtain/survey completely executed buy contract
•           Deliver duplicate of completely executed Contract into escrow
•           Obtaining Actions/Documents
•           Independent Contract Consideration to Seller
•           Compare costs to original building information
•           Receive/survey past and planned capital changes
•           Confirm property visit by Asset Management and Management Committee part
•           Confirm that all customer particular procurement prerequisites are met
•           Issue move update to Asset Management, Property Management and Accounting (if appropriate
•           Select Property Management organization
•           Finalize Property Management Agreement
•           Verify money related terms of Property Management Agreement are reflected in proforma
•           Select renting organization
•           Verify Service Contracts are at business sector
•           Verify no question with specialists, suppliers or workers
•           Verify no current or mulled over work strikes
•           Verify all commitments and exchange lenders being paid in typical course
•           Review Property administration records
(Stone and Dobinson, 1977)
Legal Precept
The property law state the owner of the property must mention the title of the property at the time of the purchase agreement. The sale deed of the property must be accompanied by the transfer of the title.
Conclusion
It is concluded that the defendant must get the title of the land transferred to his name.
b) Introduction:
The term ‘subject to contract’ has been disputed owing to the contract clause. The case relates to the dispute in the given scenario.
Discussion
The phrase “subject to contract” in particulars of sale of 15 The Green, meant by the Konny and Peterson’s refers to legal agreement between two parties for sale or exchange or property on agreed terms and conditions. It states that as per terms and conditions of contract both parties at this stage can’t step back from terms and conditions and considerations have to be paid in accordance with terms of exchange contract (B v DPP , 2000). In the case when one party has breached the terms of contract the other party can sue him and take him to court for complete accomplishment as per set conditions and requirements. Subject to contract clauses the formalities and procedure is done by buyers at preliminary and contract stage (Tuberville v Savage, 1969).
Conclusion
Payment settlement methods are further negotiated, payments have to be cleared within set period of time and property right has to be transferred from seller to buyer and everything has to be done according to the subject, terms and conditions of contract.
Introduction:
Legal Precept: The sale of a contract requires three basic conditions for fulfillment in order to give legal authenticity to a contract.
1.      There must be one seller and one buyer
2.      Both parties to a contract must be willing to act as per terms and conditions of sales contract
3.      There must be consideration to be paid by buyer and property given in return to it
(DPP v Santana-Bermudez, 2003)
For exchange of a contract the following conditions must be fulfilled.
•           The seller have concurred on an offer, including for installations and fittings
•           There must be loan valuation and any overviews seller needs
•           The buyer must have been formally offered a consideration in exchange of a contract 
•           The expert or specialist by buyer has done every applicable pursuit
•           One must have composed building protection. After you trade contracts, you are at risk for the property, thus to have structures protection set up before hand
•           The seller have concurred on a date of payment for the deal, which will be built into the agreement
•           The seller should have perused, comprehended and marked the agreement
(B v DPP , 2000)
Law society formulae B will be used in this exchange of contact as the seller holds only his own signed part of contract (DPP v Santana-Bermudez, 2003). This is the most regularly utilized strategy. Every specialist holds his own particular customer's an agreement's piece and one phones the other. e) Sale of fixtures and fittings
Fixture and fitting are categorized as assets which are installed in a building, factory or land in such a way that it becomes a part of building or factory (National Audubon Society v. Superior Court, 1983.). Fixtures and fittings are installed at a building or land in such a way that they can be removed without any damage or serious impact. Fixture and fittings are moveable assets which are installed in order to accomplish specific purposes such as production of specific items, for proper functioning of other assets etc., (People v. Watson, 2003). They experience the agreement to check they are indistinguishable and on the off chance that they will be they concur that the agreement are traded (Gibbins and Proctor, 1918). The purchaser's specialist should then promptly send the store, more often than not by customer record check, to the seller's specialist.
In this case curtains and big antique table are furniture which has to be sold separately or as per terms and conditions of contract. In case the buyer wants to take the possession of furniture as well, additional consideration has to be paid otherwise it can be sold by seller.

Task 2:

Introduction
The exchange's terms deed ought to be such that they mirror the conditions determined in the agreement; no new statement can be presented at this stage. This exchange deed is then confirmed and endorsed by the merchant's specialist who informs his agree to the purchaser's legal advisor when answering to the demands. The exchange deed can likewise be immersed at this stage; i.e. setting up a duplicate including any concurred corrections.
The enquiries related to exchange or sale contract comprises of searches, surveys and other market analysis in order to save oneself from further loss (National Audubon Society v. Superior Court, 1983.).

Searches

Searches or pre contract searches are essential preliminary activities buyer has to perform in order to have an idea about worth of property. The searches are to be done by buyer by taking into account fair value of assets and property (People v. Watson, 2003). The net book value of property or patent decrease with time due to depreciation and amortization processes

Surveys

Surveys are market analysis done by buyer from different market regarding value and market price of a property or asset. Surveys are market analysis done by experts which are one concerned regarding gathering of evidence for authentic market value of property (DPP v K, 1990). The net book value of a property varies with time as compare to its fair market value. Net book value always goes down where as fair value may fluctuate according to demand and supply trends (DPP v Santana-Bermudez, 2003). Surveys have to make by market analysts and experts in order to determine correct value of a property and to ensure a buyer that the sales and exchange of contract is worth it. . Searches help buyers to make market analysis for profitable conveyance contact and for reasonable sale and purchase. Searches help buyers to make a complete analysis of exchange contract and to gather complete knowledge about property and its market value for further sale or lease in future.

Preliminary Enquiries

Pre contract investigations and studies are helpful for making prudent decisions at the end of buyers. Sellers try to show positive sides of property and buyer assumes that there are some hidden facts regarding life of machinery or its title authenticity which seller may hide in order to make sale confirmed (Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 1976). Preliminary enquiries are initial stages of conveyancing contract which help in making pre-sale arrangements in order to save buyer from loss and seller from bad name.
Environmental search should be embraced to guarantee no administration office or neighborhood power has any case against the area and all rates and assessments have been paid. A natural hunt indicates whether a property has been based on a landfill site or whether it is prone to be influenced by contamination for whatever other reason (Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 1975). This sort of quest is vital for two reasons. Firstly most purchasers will need to know whether the house they need is prone to influenced by poisons in the dirt et cetera (Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 1975).
Besides a proprietor of area is currently obligated to tidy up their land in the event that it is influenced by poisons that can drain out onto neighboring area, so purchasing contaminated area can prompt substantial budgetary misfortune. The natural inquiry additionally gives data as to the probability of flooding or subsidence in the zone where the property stands. The natural pursuit is a profoundly specialized report and anybody other than a surveyor or basic architect would think that it’s hard to get it (DPP v Santana-Bermudez, 2003).
Conclusion
It is concluded that the organizations that give natural inquiries offer protection so that, if the pursuit neglects to caution you to a vital ecological variable and you endure misfortune thus, you will get remuneration from the insurance agency. Extra ventures, for example, a Commons Registration Search or mining hunt may be fundamental, contingent upon the property's area.
In order to check the capacity of hat Kanton Luther and Martha Pangen to convey road to clients, following document checks has to be made
·         Transfer Certificate of property
·         Original certificate of title in the name of dealing parties
·         Duly sealed contract or exchange agreement with signs of sellers
·         Physical and environmental enquiries (Gibbins and Proctor, 1918)
·         Transfer Certificate of property
·         Original certificate of title in the name of dealing parties
·         Duly sealed contract or exchange agreement with signs of sellers

Task 3:

Documentation requirements: After consideration has been payed and property is duly vacated by seller, the next step is to complete the documentation requirements and signing up the document to transfer the title to buyer (Stone and Dobinson, 1977). The documentation requirements have to be completed in the presence of witnesses and buyer and signatures of all parties are duly required. In order to enable seller and buyer proceeds the sale and purchase following documents have to be signed (Stone and Dobinson, 1977).
Requisition of sale document: Demands on Title of Tulsi Mencki  are inquiries regarding the property the buyer is qualified for request that the seller see whether buyer knows anything that may not be right with the title to the area (Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 1975). The buyer sends Requisitions on Title to the dealer's specialist inside of 21 days from the agreement's date.
Contract draft: As the purchaser's conveyancing specialist is sending the demand to buyer, he readies a draft exchange deed to Tulsi Mencki and sends it to the vender's specialist for approbation. An exchange deed alludes to an understanding where both sides consent to do the agreement. In this way, the exchange assertion initiates the agreement and brings the terms and conditions alive (Stone and Dobinson, 1977).
b) Transfer of Property ownership document
After completion of whole process or agreement, the seller and buyer sign transfer deed and submit paper at office of transfer attorney. After submission
·         Both parties send their original documents for authentication purpose to concerned authorities
·         Buyer has to pay transfer duty charges and other related expenses
·         The bond attorney after receiving guarantee from cancellation attorney, who later sends the documents to transfer attorney for final transfer of title to buyer ownership
c) Tulsi Mencki should encourage buyer to take legal advice in order to prove authenticity of property and its market value (Stone and Dobinson, 1977). The selling party has to make sure to buyer that the property has the same fair value as presented in documents in order to avoid any litigation of claim of misrepresentation after sale. Advice from lawyer gives legal identity to value of property and buyer can’t claim loss of fraud committed by seller after the market goes down for the property due to any other reason.
(I)                AP1: In case contract of sale has made for a property or asset which is duly mortgaged OR otherwise, it has to be first cancelled in terms of mortgage then it can be transferred to any other party (People v. Watson, 2003). The seller has to complete change in name of property owner in terms of mortgage by cancelling his own name in the books of registrar. Form AP1 is required to file in order to change the name of owner of property upon selling or exchange or contract in the name of new owner of property.

(II)             DS1: This form is to be used as a continuation sheet along with AP1 or DS2 and can’t be used individually. As per set terms and conditions between seller and buyer, if the property is in the use of seller, buyer gives a reasonable time frame in order to get the property ownership cancelled by previous owner (DPP v K, 1990). Sometimes at the time of sale of property, the asset is duly rent out to third party and the lease or rent agreement may last longer after transfer of title. This form is presented as a request to registrar to cancel the ownership of seller.
(III)          SDLT5: After documents are duly completed and terms are agreed between both parties, the title documents will be presented to registrar for stamping and authentication process. Stamping can be done manually or through online system called e-stamping (Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 1975). Stamping process is comprised on two level processes
First is initial stamping of agreement. Second is subsequent stamping of agreement
Form SDLT5 is used for stamping procedure and for payment of online stamp duty in lieu of property transfer procedure.  






 

Bibliography

B v DPP , Docket No. L.A. 29651. (Royal Courts of Justice November 7, 2000).
DPP v K, Docket No. 45149 (Supreme Court of UK Feb 21, 1990).
DPP v Santana-Bermudez, Docket No. L.A. 29820. (Supreme Court of UK August 30, 2003).
DPP v Santana-Bermudez, Docket No. L.A. 30520. (Supreme Court of UK December 27, 2003).
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Docket No. Sac. 7981 (Royal Courts of Justice January 20, 1975).
Gibbins and Proctor, Docket No. S006987 (Supreme Court of UK July 9, 1918).
Harrow London Borough Council v Shah , Docket No. S012525 (Royal Courts of Justice November 15, 1999).
National Audubon Society v. Superior Court, Docket No. S.F. 24368. (Supreme Court of UK February 17, 1983.).
People v. Watson, DPP v Santana Bermudez (Supreme Court of UK July 3, 2003).
Stone and Dobinson, Docket No. S023721 (Court of Appeal in London May 20, 1977).
Stone and Dobinson, Docket No. L.A. 30824. (Court of Appeals London Dec 3, 1977).
Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 17 Cal.3d 425 (1976) (Supreme Court of California July 1, 1976).

Tuberville v Savage, Docket No. L.A. 30277. (High Court of Justice March 31, 1969).